FPL Gameweek 5 Transfer Market: Rogers Leads the Charge as Injury Exits Gather Pace
FPL Admin
FPL Elite Analyst
Gameweek 5 Transfer Market Report
The Gameweek 5 market is being driven by a blend of strong recent returns, impressive underlying numbers and a few clear availability concerns. Morgan Rogers is the headline transfer target, while several popular exits look justified by either poor form or a doubtful status. However, not every rising name has the data to support the hype.
The biggest transfer-in trends
| Player | Transfers In | Price | Form | xGI | ICT Index | Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Rogers | 85,742 | £7.6m | 6.8 | 2.55 | 28.7 | 35.0% |
| Mohamed Belloumi | 45,754 | £5.0m | 6.8 | 0.56 | 11.1 | 1.5% |
| João Pedro Junqueira de Jesus | 34,324 | £7.7m | 8.2 | 2.37 | 26.9 | 73.9% |
| Kevin Schade | 33,817 | £6.0m | 7.5 | 1.27 | 20.1 | 4.0% |
| Martin Ødegaard | 31,210 | £6.7m | 6.8 | 2.26 | 27.1 | 18.5% |
| Semi Ajayi | 27,430 | £4.2m | 6.5 | 0.65 | 10.7 | 12.8% |
| Ezri Konsa Ngoyo | 23,728 | £4.5m | 2.8 | 0.01 | 2.8 | 16.9% |
| Riccardo Calafiori | 22,487 | £5.8m | 7.0 | 1.19 | 11.8 | 49.3% |
Rogers is the clear standout
Morgan Rogers has attracted 85,742 transfers in, comfortably the largest figure in the supplied data. The move is supported by a strong statistical profile: 27 points, 6.8 form, a 2.55 xGI and a 28.7 ICT Index. His 35.0% ownership is significant without making him universally owned, suggesting the market still sees room for further growth.
Rogers also has the strongest xGI among the incoming players listed, narrowly ahead of João Pedro and Ødegaard. This makes his popularity look more evidence-based than purely reactionary.
João Pedro offers form and points, but little ownership protection
João Pedro has the best form of any incoming player at 8.2, alongside 33 points and seven bonus points. His 2.37 xGI is also excellent. The main question is not his recent output, but whether managers are simply trying to catch up with a player already owned by 73.9% of teams.
This is a high-performing transfer rather than a differential move. Managers buying him are backing continued returns, not gaining a major ownership advantage.
Ødegaard is backed by strong underlying numbers
Martin Ødegaard’s 27 points and 6.8 form are complemented by a 2.26 xGI and a 27.1 ICT Index. His expected assists of 1.25 are the highest among the incoming players, while his £6.7m price sits below the cost of both Rogers and João Pedro.
The 31,210 transfers in appear relatively logical. His numbers suggest more than a short-term points chase, although his 18.5% ownership means he is not an ultra-differential selection.
Schade and Belloumi: promising, but with different levels of evidence
Kevin Schade has delivered 30 points and 7.5 form at £6.0m, with 1.27 xGI and a 20.1 ICT Index. His 4.0% ownership gives him genuine differential appeal. The underlying numbers are not as strong as those of Rogers, João Pedro or Ødegaard, but the combination of form, price and low ownership makes the move understandable.
Mohamed Belloumi is the more speculative purchase. He has 27 points and 6.8 form at just £5.0m, but his xGI of 0.56 and ICT Index of 11.1 are considerably lower than the leading transfer targets. With only 1.5% ownership, he is clearly being bought as a budget differential. The trend could pay off, but the available data offers less statistical support.
The questionable incoming moves
Ezri Konsa Ngoyo is the biggest red flag among the transfer-in list. His 11 points and 2.8 form are weak, while his xGI is only 0.01 and his ICT Index is 2.8. The transfer activity may be driven by price or defensive expectations, but the supplied attacking data provides almost no evidence of upside.
Semi Ajayi and Riccardo Calafiori have stronger recent numbers. Ajayi has 26 points and 6.5 form at £4.2m, though his xGI of 0.65 is modest. Calafiori’s 28 points, 7.0 form and 1.19 xGI look more convincing, but his 49.3% ownership means the move is more about joining a popular trend than finding a hidden gem.
The biggest transfer-out trends
| Player | Transfers Out | Price | Form | xGI | ICT Index | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Szoboszlai | 44,773 | £7.0m | 4.5 | 2.09 | 25.5 | Available |
| Igor Thiago Nascimento Rodrigues | 24,180 | £7.9m | 1.2 | 2.54 | 13.8 | Available |
| Cody Gakpo | 21,122 | £7.2m | 7.2 | 1.66 | 27.7 | Available |
| Pedro Porro Sauceda | 19,336 | £5.5m | 2.0 | 0.52 | 9.3 | Doubtful |
| Mamadou Sangaré | 19,067 | £5.7m | 5.5 | 1.06 | 14.1 | Available |
| Luke Shaw | 18,720 | £4.4m | 1.8 | 0.53 | 18.4 | Doubtful |
| Alexander Isak | 17,546 | £9.1m | 6.2 | 2.85 | 29.1 | Available |
| Christos Tzolis | 17,067 | £6.4m | 3.5 | 0.65 | 18.8 | Available |
The injury-led exits look sensible
Pedro Porro and Luke Shaw are both marked doubtful, and they have recorded 19,336 and 18,720 transfers out respectively. Their recent form is also poor: 2.0 for Porro and 1.8 for Shaw. These exits appear to have a clear data-based explanation, combining availability concerns with limited recent output.
Thiago is losing managers despite strong xGI
Igor Thiago has the weakest form in the entire transfer-out group at 1.2, with only five points. Yet his 2.54 xGI is one of the highest figures in the list, behind only Isak’s 2.85 and ahead of Szoboszlai’s 2.09.
This is an important warning against judging solely by recent points. Selling Thiago may be understandable for managers prioritising current returns, but the underlying numbers suggest the move could be a knee-jerk if there is no other reason to leave him.
Isak and Gakpo are the most debatable sales
Alexander Isak has the best xGI among all players in the data at 2.85, a 29.1 ICT Index, 25 points and 6.2 form. Despite this, 17,546 managers have transferred him out. Based on the supplied numbers alone, Isak looks like one of the clearest potential overreactions in the market.
Cody Gakpo’s exit trend is similarly debatable. He has 29 points, 7.2 form and the second-highest ICT Index among the listed outgoing players at 27.7. His xGI of 1.66 is lower than several alternatives, but his recent output does not strongly support a mass sale.
Szoboszlai’s sales are more understandable, but not risk-free
Dominik Szoboszlai is the most transferred-out player in the data, with 44,773 exits. His form of 4.5 is underwhelming, although his 2.09 xGI and 25.5 ICT Index show that he still carries meaningful attacking involvement.
The trend is understandable when compared with incoming options such as Rogers and Ødegaard, who both have better form and stronger recent points profiles. Still, selling Szoboszlai is not a move entirely free of risk because his underlying numbers remain competitive.
Smart moves or knee-jerks?
Transfers that look smart
- •Morgan Rogers in: Excellent xGI, strong ICT Index, good form and substantial recent output.
- •Martin Ødegaard in: Strong expected-assist numbers, solid xGI and a reasonable £6.7m price.
- •João Pedro in: The best form and highest points total among the incoming players, supported by a 2.37 xGI.
- •Pedro Porro and Luke Shaw out: Both are doubtful and have poor recent form.
- •Cody Gakpo out only with a clear plan: His sale is understandable only if funds are needed for a stronger statistical upgrade.
Transfers that look more like knee-jerks
- •Ezri Konsa in: Low form, minimal xGI and a very low ICT Index make the move difficult to justify from the supplied data.
- •Mohamed Belloumi in: A tempting £5.0m differential, but his underlying numbers are modest.
- •Igor Thiago out: Poor recent returns are being chased despite a strong 2.54 xGI.
- •Alexander Isak out: His 2.85 xGI and 29.1 ICT Index make the scale of the sales difficult to support statistically.
Conclusion
The Gameweek 5 market has one especially clear signal: Morgan Rogers is being bought for reasons that the data supports. João Pedro and Ødegaard also have strong cases, while Schade offers an intriguing low-ownership alternative.
The outgoing market is more mixed. Doubtful defenders are logical sales, but the departures of Isak, Gakpo and Thiago deserve caution because their underlying numbers remain useful. The best approach is to separate genuine form and availability information from simple points-chasing. In this market, not every popular move is a smart one—and not every player losing transfers should be discarded.